Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Student guest post on drug repurposing



Antiques Become Modern
     The repositioning process for drugs means discovering new clinical benefits for a drug that has been already approved to treat other diseases or conditions, according to The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Health and Human Services. It has been estimated that 30% of new drugs and vaccines approved by the US FDA in recent years attributes to the process of drug repurposing, repositioning, and rescue. This process offers many advantages including the costs and time saved from circumventing the extensive testing typically required for demonstrating the safety of a newly developed drug. Since these drugs have already been approved for human use, the well characterized properties (pharmacology, toxicology, and formulation) of these candidates allow for the process involved in therapeutic switching to a novel clinical use to occur relatively quickly. Because of the extensive financial commitments and time required for developing a new drug, the goal of bringing a new drug to market with a relatively low cost is very attractive.  The cost associated with the development of a new drug is estimated at over $2 billion, and the timeline typically involves more than 12 - 16 years. In contrast, a repurposed drug can be approved in an extensively shorter time frame, 3- 12 years, with an average cost of $300 million. In addition, approval rates for new drugs are typically close to 10%, but is often 30% for therapeutically switched drugs. Finally, the process of repositioning of drugs could represent substantial assistance for low income patients who have chronic diseases, for example autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), since they can obtain their medications for considerably lower prices.

     There are a number of successful drug repurposing stories. Perhaps the most famous stories of a repurposed drug involves thalidomide. Thalidomide had been used to treat morning sickness in pregnant women in the 50s of the last century, then it was withdrawn from markets due to birth deformities. This drug has been synthesized as racemic mixture because it is a chiral compound. Lately, it was discovered that one of the enantiomers (the (R)-(+)-enantiomer) was effective to treat pregnant morning sickness, while, the (S)-(-)-enantiomer made the congenital malformations. Nowadays, this drug has been repurposed and has been approved by FDA to treat leprosy in 1998 and multiple myeloma in 2006. Another success story involves sildenafil. This drug was originally developed to treat hypertension, but it failed during development. However, during clinical trials, it was noticed that sildenafil could improve erectile dysfunction. As a result, it was approved to treat erectile dysfunction. Since that time, sildenafil has been subjected for further re-tasking and is now approved to treat pulmonary hypertension.

References:
1.      I. Agranat, H. Caner, J. Caldwell, “The Thalidomide Tragedy: The Myth of a Missed Opportunity,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1, 753-768 (2002).
3.      28. Joseph A. DiMasi & Henry G. Grabowski, The Cost of Biopharmaceutical R&D: Is Biotech Different?, 28 MANAGERIAL & DECISION ECON. 469, 469 & 475 (2007).

4.      UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE (GAO), NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT: SCIENCE, BUSINESS, REGULATORY, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ISSUES CITED AS HAMPERING DRUG DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS 1 (2006).

7 comments:

  1. Wow, I really found this post to be interesting! I had heard about sidenafil originally being tested to see its effects on hypertension, but the example of thalidomide was a new one for me. It's interesting to see different enantiomers of the same compound can have vastly different effects. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. So this is different than off-label use? I know off-label use is fairly common and is a way to treat things without requiring any change or anything.
    I think this is very interesting. Drugs are SO expensive to make that it is really cool that we can repurpose them for much cheaper, comparatively. I am interested to see what other drugs can be repurposed. Good article!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Repurposing these drugs i believe is very strategic for the developing companies; not only is it cheaper and less time consuming to come up with, it can also be the game changer for those individuals with chronic conditions or acute conditions with the potential to develop chronically.
    I also found it interesting that half racemic mixture enatiomer conformation of the Thalidomide could cause such adverse affects when alleviating the mother of morning sickness. I am also thankful for the repurposing of this particular drug; coming from a future mother, but also for the versatility of its advancement to treat other health conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very interesting! I remember when I was working in a neurology clinic, one of the physicians explained to me why Propranolol (typically used to treat hypertension) was also used to treat essential tremors due to one of its side effects. It is very interesting to think how repurposing drugs can make it easier and cheaper to treat patients.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My questions after reading this: (1) generic drugs and (2) insurance coverage. I can understand multiple drugs being re-used for other purposes based off their chemical formula, which is amazing in itself... BUT is that the same for generics as well? I assume it would be given generic drugs just have a different name, not so much a different formula. Some drugs have lethal enantiomers, which I would think is considered as well. My second question is, would insurance cover it? More likely? Less likely?
    Good article and lots of food for thought!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is Kai. It is very interesting! How is the situation in Other countries? In China, it seems there is no special funding for this research, although customers discover new functions of the drug themselves which may not be confirmed by officials

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know a lot of doctors use medications for "off-label" use to treat diseases or conditions that a drug is technically not approved for by the FDA. There should be a system set up where doctors can submit alternative treatment uses of specific medications. This could possibly help lead researchers to explore more options regarding the repurposing a drug currently on the market.

    ReplyDelete