![]() |
Figure 1: Minimal
energy conformations (A) and 2D
structures of CBD and THC (B)(Burstein,
2015). |
Cannabis is comprised of two main compounds,
which are tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CBD. CBD is the main compound of
cannabis that has sparked research interest due to its similar structure and
nature to THC, without producing the psychoactive high that THC produces (Figure 1). CBD is a cannabinoid, so its
chemical targets are the CB1 and CB2 receptors. The CB1 receptor is found on
neurons and glial cells, while the CB2 receptor is primarily found throughout
the immune system (Volkow, 2015). The difference in structural conformation
between CBD and THC allows THC to tightly bind to the CB1 receptor while CBD
binds to the CB1 receptor with low affinity. The difference in binding
affinities allows CBD to act on other pathways in the brain without eliciting a
psychoactive effect (Volkow, 2015). The broad range of CBD’s therapeutic
effects include exerting antioxidant, neuroprotectant, anti-tumor,
antipsychotic, and anti-anxiety activities. These therapeutic uses have been
tested through cell culture and animal models, however, in recent years a new
therapeutic benefit of CBD emerged. Emerging research has indicated that CBD
may also be used to reduce seizures and act as a mild anti-convulsant and is
now an FDA approved therapeutic for treating seizures within genetic diseases.
Research
completed by Patel et al. (2019)
emphasized a possible clinical application of CBD. Using the TMEV-induced model
of epilepsy, researchers were able to observe the role CBD plays in epileptic
seizures. Here, researchers administered two different doses of TMEV to the mice;
one group was administered 180 mg/kg and the other group was administered 150
mg/kg and each dose was administered twice a day. These mice were analyzed
based on the number and intensity of seizures experienced daily (graded by the
Racine scale). When observing the outcomes between the two populations, they
observed that the population administered with the 180mg/kg dose of CBD experienced
a significant decrease in the frequency and severity of seizures due to TMEV
infection. While the population administered with 150 mg/kg of CBD experienced
decreased frequency of seizures, they did not experience a significant decrease
in the severity of seizures. These results from Patel et al. (2019) suggest that CBD displays promising characteristics
as an anti-seizure therapeutic for intractable epilepsies. This evidence of
therapeutic success within the TMEV model suggests that further studies should
be completed to further investigate the pharmacological effects and mechanisms
behind CBD.
Following
the research done by Patel et al., Anderson
et al. (2019) explored the
pharmacokinetics of CBD and clobazam as a therapeutic to treat Dravet’s
syndrome. Dravet’s syndrome, similarly to TMEV, is an intractable childhood
epilepsy. The evidence of CBD’s effects as an anti-seizure medication sparked
Anderson et al.’s interest to test
CBD’s pharmacokinetics as an adjunct with clobazam. Anderson et al. (2019) utilized Scn1a+/- mice to model the
effects of Dravet’s syndrome. Utilizing this mice population, they administered
clobazam with various concentrations of CBD, including concentrations that were
above and below the anticonvulsant dosage for CBD. Anderson et al. (2019) then subjected the Scn1a+/- mice to
hyperthermia-induced seizure experiments and measured the drug-drug
interactions and overall therapeutic efficacy of the treatment. When an
anticonvulsant dose of CBD was paired with clobazam, Anderson et al. observed an increased efficacy of
clobazam treatment on the mice. CBD acted by extending the half-life,
increasing exposure time, and increasing interactions of clobazam and its
target, N-CLB. Anderson et al. also discovered a pharmacokinetic
mechanism between CBD and clobazam that enhanced inhibitory GABAA
receptor activation, further contributing to its efficacy in treating
intractable epilepsy.
![]() |
Figure 2: U.S. funding of the various cannabis research sectors (https://www.science.org/content/article/cannabis-research-database-shows-how-us-funding-focuses-harms-drug) The studies by Patel et al. and Anderson et al. displayed the therapeutic efficacy and the pharmacological interactions associated with the anti-seizure effects of CBD. Even with strong evidence supporting CBD’s therapeutic benefits, research is still slow to take off due in part, to cannabis being labeled as a Schedule I drug. This labelling has led to funding cannabis research that focuses on harm and abuse of cannabis, rather than the therapeutic benefits (O’Grady, 2021). This skewed distribution of funding has allowed for increased research on why cannabis is a dangerous and abusive substance, rather than the possible benefits of isolated compounds derived from cannabis. This has made introducing cannabis-derived therapeutics challenging, as it is illegal to produce so it is hard to obtain and further isolate its compounds. This negative stigma has been slowly chipped away by public opinion and cultural shifts, which can be observed by 36 states having legalized cannabis and their products for medicinal use. This rapid shifting of cultural norms and values has allowed further CBD and cannabinoid research to take place, allowing for further exploration of the therapeutic benefits that these compounds display. This increase in research has allowed the medical community to realize the therapeutic and clinical benefits of CBD use. The only question to be answered now is: when will society see CBD as a viable therapeutic, rather than simply another recreational substance?
References Anderson, L. L.,
Absalom, N. L., Abelev, S. V., Low, I. K., Doohan, P. T., Martin, L. J.,
Chebib, M., McGregor, I. S., & Arnold, J. C. (2019). Coadministered
cannabidiol and clobazam: Preclinical evidence for both pharmacodynamic and
pharmacokinetic interactions. Epilepsia,
60(11), 2224–2234.
https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16355 Bissell, L. J. L.,
Balneaves, L. G., Oliffe, J. L., Capler, N. R., & Buxton, J. (2013).
Perceptions of cannabis as a stigmatized medicine: A qualitative descriptive
study. Harm Reduction Journal, 10(1), 2.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-10-2 Burstein, S. (2015).
Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: A review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 23(7), 1377–1385.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.01.059 Commissioner, O. of the. (2020, July
31). FDA approves new indication for drug containing an active ingredient
derived from cannabis to treat seizures in rare genetic disease. U.S. Food
and Drug Administration. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-indication-drug-containing-active-ingredient-derived-cannabis-treat-seizures-rare.
O'Grady,
C. (2020, August 27). Cannabis research database shows how U.S. funding
focuses on harms of the drug. Science. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from
https://www.science.org/content/article/cannabis-research-database-shows-how-us-funding-focuses-harms-drug.
Patel, D. C., Wallis,
G., Fujinami, R. S., Wilcox, K. S., & Smith, M. D. (2019). Cannabidiol
reduces seizures following CNS infection with Theiler's murine
encephalomyelitis virus. Epilepsia Open,
4(3), 431–442.
https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12351 Volkow, N. D. (2015,
June 24). The biology and potential
therapeutic effects of cannabidiol. NIDA Archives. Retrieved October 17,
2021, from
https://archives.drugabuse.gov/testimonies/2015/biology-potential-therapeutic-effects-cannabidiol.
|

















